Key Takeaways
- As soon as one in every of crypto’s most hyped tasks, ICO-era startup Dragonchain and its founder have been charged at this time by the SEC for the sale of $16.5 million in unregistered securities.
- The fees observe years of alleged mismanagement and reportedly tyrannical management below CEO Joe Roets, whom staff declare managed the corporate with “concern and intimidation.”
- Dragonchain’s lavish spending and poor monetary administration shortly resulted within the venture’s deterioration and drew the eye of regulators within the U.S.
Share this text
Dragonchain as soon as had huge ambitions to carry the “magic of blockchain know-how” to companies across the nation. As we speak, the Securities and Change Fee is charging the venture and its founder, Joe Roets, with having offered $16.5 million in unregistered securities from 2017 to 2022. Crypto Briefing takes a deep dive into the startup’s rise and fall.
The Dragon Awakens
Dragonchain was initially developed in 2015 from one of many Walt Disney Firm’s incubators because the Disney Personal Blockchain Platform. That’s till the architect behind the venture, John Joseph Roets (who goes by “Joe” Roets), went rogue, based on his early collaborators.
Roets spun the venture out as a non-profit, wresting management of the mental property and model from Disney and chopping ties together with his former collaborators totally. In August of 2017, Dragonchain Inc. was introduced, a for-profit startup eager on cashing in on the cryptocurrency mania.
The startup aimed to construct a “turnkey blockchain platform for enterprise.” Like many rivals, it promised “safety and adaptability unseen out there,” positioning Dragonchain for “exponential development.”
Dragonchain introduced it could elevate cash by promoting its personal cryptocurrency, referred to as “Dragon tokens.” Moreover, past constructing its personal know-how to compete with different enterprise blockchains, like Hyperledger and R3, Dragonchain sought to kind an incubator to assist different startups elevate their very own rounds on the Dragonchain platform.
Shortly after saying the launch of its for-profit company, Dragonchain held two preliminary coin choices, or ICOs. Enthusiasm across the sale was great, with traders from Asia to Europe excited by Disney’s potential involvement, regardless of the venture not having any affiliation with the media large.
Benefiting from the identify affiliation, Dragonchain was in a position to elevate over $15 million in Bitcoin and Ethereum over the course of 4 months. On the insistence of Roets, participation within the sale was out there to anybody on the planet with out restrictions.
On account of surging cryptocurrency costs, the startup’s hoard was value over $50 million by December. At its peak in January 2018, Dragon tokens have been value over $5 every, giving the corporate a valuation of over $1.2 billion.
Spending the Treasure Hoard
On the again of the profitable fundraising, Dragonchain was in a position to extra than simply develop its workforce and open a brand new workplace. It generously sponsored most of the newly sprouted blockchain conferences and occasions in Washington state, in addition to funding one in every of its personal—Blockchain Seattle. The startup even helped fund the formation of the Washington Know-how Business Affiliation’s Cascadia Blockchain Council (WTIA).
Different expenditures have been just a little extra lavish. Dragonchain’s non-profit bought a penthouse value $2.2 million atop the Bellevue Pacific Tower to entertain purchasers and traders. In July 2018, it sponsored NASCAR Cup Sequence driver Corey LaJoie in Daytona. In 2019, the startup commissioned a media firm to supply a documentary sequence about Dragonchain.
Regardless of the spectacular spending, nonetheless, it wasn’t lengthy after Dragonchain’s token sale earlier than bother started.
The Drawback with ICOs
After its profitable raises, Dragonchain needed to assist different blockchain tasks elevate their very own multi-million greenback rounds. Inside months, it signed on tens of startups trying to elevate cash.
At the very least one firm was in a position to elevate cash on high of the Dragonchain platform. Look Lateral, an organization attempting to promote shares of artwork by way of cryptocurrency, held a token sale facilitated by Dragonchain in 2018.
Nonetheless, round this time, regulators started scrutinizing the untamed ICO scene. Many of those token gross sales have been unregistered securities choices, based on tips from regulators.
These guidelines, enforced by the Securities and Change Fee (SEC), make sure that traders obtain constant and correct monetary details about the businesses they put money into. The regulator is especially vigilant about securities investments supplied to most of the people.
Round 2017, the SEC began ramping up its cryptocurrency choices enforcement. In December 2017, the Fee issued its first cease-and-desist proceedings towards an organization promoting tokens issued on a blockchain.
Via 2018, the regulator continued to tighten enforcement. That 12 months, it halted a number of fraudulent choices, shut down an unregistered cryptocurrency change, and even charged boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. and music producer DJ Khaled for unlawfully selling ICOs.
Nonetheless, Joe Roets was voracious when it got here to fundraising, pushing corporations to lift cash by way of Dragonchain whereas the market was nonetheless sizzling, mentioned Brandon Kite, the previous software program growth lead at Dragonchain. “However there’s no approach anyone may use Dragonchain for that stuff legally, that’s why they don’t have any prospects,” Kite mentioned. Two former executives on the firm have gone so far as to say that Roets and two different staff have been immediately subpoenaed by the SEC in 2019. Crypto Briefing confirmed this date after one supply shared the subpoena they acquired from the SEC.
The scrutiny had an influence on enterprise. For instance, blockchain id startup LifeID was one of many startups that thought of becoming a member of Dragonchain’s incubator. The founding father of the corporate, Chris Boscolo, informed Crypto Briefing that his firm had been in negotiations to conduct an ICO by way of Dragonchain in late 2017. However, primarily based on steerage from his authorized counsel, he was informed to restrict the providing to accredited traders with the intention to stay in compliance with securities legal guidelines.
That’s when the deal broke down with Dragonchain. Based on Boscolo, the corporate knowledgeable him that they have been solely desirous about supporting his token sale if there have been no restrictions on who may take part—similar to Dragonchain’s personal ICO.
The insistence would show to be a dealbreaker. “LifeID has determined to observe the steerage of their authorized workforce and due diligence for his or her ICO. Upcoming presale has been canceled,” said Dragonchain on social media.
Ruling Via Worry
Crypto Briefing interviewed greater than 10 staff on the firm and reached out to greater than 30 individuals related to the corporate in whole. Many declined to remark, desirous to keep away from litigation or harassment. People who did converse mentioned that the Roets’ managed the corporate by way of “ concern and intimidation,” with some describing the expertise as “traumatic.”
In conversations with former staff, many cited the identical cause for leaving—their poor therapy by Joe Roets and his spouse, Shirly Roets, who was second in command.
Chin-One Chan, Dragonchain’s Advertising and marketing Supervisor for Asia throughout its ICO, spoke with Crypto Briefing about her work at Dragonchain. Three months into her engagement, she claimed that Dragonchain tried to coerce her into signing a non-disclosure settlement after she raised considerations about guarantees made in the course of the ICO. When she refused, Dragonchain fired her and withheld her wages together with Dragon tokens she was presupposed to obtain for the work she carried out, based on Chan.
One other worker alleged that after they have been fired, the corporate tampered with their W-2 filings with the IRS and three colleagues in an alleged try to extend their tax invoice as punishment.d
A number of staff additionally mentioned they’d Dragon tokens promised to them for his or her work that was “clawed again.” A complete of 20% of Dragon tokens issued have been allotted to founders and early staff, much like inventory choices. Considered one of these staff confirmed Crypto Briefing an employment settlement detailing their allocation of tokens.
Staff mentioned they have been requested to return these tokens for tax functions and that they’d be returned at a later date. They declare to have by no means acquired them, and once they pressed Dragonchain in regards to the tokens, the corporate used it as negotiating leverage or just didn’t distribute them in any respect. Transactions on the blockchain line up with tales from these staff.
Not solely would the corporate try and intimidate individuals financially, however Dragonchain would additionally achieve this legally. “Joe Roets is litigious, to say the least,” mentioned one former worker. Greater than two staff concerned with the corporate mentioned that Joe Roets initiated “frivolous lawsuits” towards them after they left.
One hanging instance of the situations at Dragonchain is from a former government, who spoke with Crypto Briefing on situation of anonymity. They mentioned that after elevating considerations about “inconsistencies” in Dragonchain’s funds, Joe Roets “pulled a gun out in entrance of me, pointed it at me, after which pointed it at himself,” saying “possibly I ought to finish all of it.” Shortly after the incident, Joe and Shirly Roets fired the chief, they mentioned.
Proof of Monetary Misery
Since its inception, there was little proof that Dragonchain has generated significant income from corporations utilizing its platform.
Although this isn’t uncommon for a high-risk startup, the corporate seemingly sabotaged offers with potential prospects. “Joe Roets went out of his method to scare off Starbucks,” mentioned August Harper, previously Roets’ government assistant.
One other former government corroborated the 2 incidents, saying that “after we have been near signing new prospects, together with Starbucks, Joe would drive them away.” Brandon Kite added that, “Joe was extra desirous about sustaining the worth of his Dragon [tokens] than he was in working a enterprise.” With out dependable income, the corporate turned towards dependence on the cash it raised by way of its ICO.
Nonetheless, these funds are solely value a fraction of what they have been throughout 2017. Since then, the worth of the Dragon token has collapsed. Beforehand, one in every of these tokens commanded as a lot as $5. By the top of 2018 they traded beneath $0.10; now, they go for lower than $0.02.
There have been different indicators that the corporate was experiencing monetary problem as properly. In Might of 2019, the corporate offered its penthouse at a $242,000 loss. Across the similar time, the corporate was delinquent on over $119,000 in taxes.
Lawrence Lerner, the corporate’s former President of Consulting Providers and a former bigwig at now defunct blockchain venture RChain, informed Crypto Briefing he left as a result of “they didn’t have any cash to pay me.” Different service suppliers additionally reported that they may not accumulate funds from Dragonchain.
In the meantime, Joe and Shirly Roets have been accumulating salaries of $200,000 and $180,000, based on one former government. Even with these excellent payments, Dragonchain made a $500,000 funding in Coinme, a Seattle-based Bitcoin ATM firm, at the start of 2020.
On situation of anonymity, one of many firm’s former controllers informed Crypto Briefing that, whereas they have been organizing the corporate’s books, they discovered “issues lacking.” Some transactions carried out in cryptocurrency “didn’t make its approach again to the corporate,” they mentioned. They tried to trace down these transactions, and once they pressed the problem, the previous controller mentioned they have been fired.
The Aftermath of Mania
On August 16, 2022, years after first subpoenaing Dragonchain executives and staff, the SEC formally charged Joe Roets and Dragonchain for promoting unregistered securities. The company claims Dragonchain raised $14 million from about 5,000 traders worldwide throughout its ICO, and cashed in one other $2.5 million within the interval from 2019 to 2022.
The SEC is looking for everlasting injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgement curiosity, civil penalties, and conduct-based injunctions towards Roets and Dragonchain’s company entities.
Joe Roets acknowledged in an open letter that he was assured he had a “very robust case” towards the fees. He moreover took the chance to extol the virtues of blockchain know-how, calling it “liberty encapsulated in software program,” and ended his letter with a quote from the revolutionary author Thomas Paine: “Tyranny, like hell, isn’t simply conquered; but we’ve this comfort with us, that the tougher the battle, the extra wonderful the triumph.”
Many of those points weren’t distinctive to Dragonchain. There have been tons of of startups from 2017 by way of 2018 that raised hundreds of thousands on the promise of blockchain know-how. A few of these corporations disappeared totally. Others have been proven to be fraudulent. Some are nonetheless ready to see what occurs.
Dragonchain was one in every of many corporations swept up within the mania of 2017. It wasn’t the one venture that acted rashly—and even fraudulently—with the cash it raised from traders. Like a lot of these startups trying to faucet into the “transformative energy of blockchain,” they left former staff and traders with little to indicate for his or her work and the cash entrusted to them.
Issues occur shortly and impulsively within the cryptocurrency area, however accountability strikes slowly and intentionally. What looks like historical historical past to crypto natives continues to be contemporary within the minds of regulators, authorities, and legislation enforcement, and the SEC’s actions towards Dragonchain years after the very fact reveal that its reminiscence is lengthy and its persistence considerable.
Disclosure: On the time of writing, the writer of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and different cryptocurrencies.